University Students' Attitudes towards Genetic Testing: A Comparative Study

Merav Siani^1, and Orit Ben-Zvi Assaraf¹

¹Science and Technology Education Department, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Be'er-Sheva8410501, Israel

Cite this paper

Merav Siani and Orit Ben-Zvi Assaraf. University Students' Attitudes towards Genetic Testing: A Comparative Study. American Journal of Public Health Research. 2015; 3(3):81-90. doi: 10.12691/AJPHR-3-3-1

Abstract

Background: Genetic counseling has become a tool for preventing genetic diseases in western society. It deals with the risk of genetic diseases in families and finds ways to prevent future problems. The public’s decision making regarding genetic counseling is influenced by cognitive, cultural and religious variables. Aim and objectives: To examine the attitudes of undergraduate Israeli students toward genetic issues and learn how these are affected by the field they study, their religious affiliation and their gender. Methods: We gave 490 students a Likert type quantitative questionnaire consisting of several genetic cases, and asked the students to express their attitudes towards each one. Results and conclusion: Of the three factors we assessed, the most influential is the students’ religious affiliation. Religious students, especially those who do not study life sciences (LS), place less trust in genetic tests than secular students (p=0.0001). Students of LS show more critical thinking towards genetic testing than others (p=0.0128). Gender was least influential, showing a mixed trend of influence. The results of this research can serve as a basis for developing culturally sensitive educational programs in genetics.

Keywords

genetic counseling, attitudes, quantitative assessment, genetic testing, undergraduate students

Copyright

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

References

[1]	National Society of Genetic Counselors [NSGC]: Available at http://www.nsgc.org.and accessed in 6/5/2014.
[2]	Shiloh, S. (1996) Decision-making in the context of genetic risk, in: T. Marteu& M. Richards(Eds) The Troubled Helix: social and psychological implications of the new human genetics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
[3]	Marteau, T.M., Dormandy, E., Michie, S. (2001). A measure of informed choice. Health Expectations, 4:99-108.
[4]	Awwad, R., McCarthy, V. P., Bartels D.M., LeRoy B.S.,(2008). Culture and Acculturation Influences on Palestinian Perceptions of Prenatal Genetic Counseling. Genetic Counseling, 17:101-116.
[5]	Sterling, R., Henderson, G. E., &Corbie-Smith, G. (2006). Public willingness to participate in and public opinions about genetic variation research: a review of the literature. American Journal of Public Health, 96(11), 1971-1978.‏
[6]	Raz, A. E., &Atar, M. (2003). Nondirectiveness and its lay interpretations: the effect of counseling style, ethnicity and culture on attitudes towards genetic counseling among Jewish and Bedouin respondents in Israel. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 12(4), 313-332.
[7]	Shaw, A. (2011). Risk and reproductive decisions: British Pakistani couples’ responses to genetic counselling. Social Science & Medicine, 73(1), 111-120.‏
[8]	Ten Have, H. (2001). Genetics and culture: The geneticization thesis Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy, 4: 295-304.
[9]	Ajzen I., Fishbein M. (1980) Understanding Attitudes and Predicting Social Behavior. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
[10]	Christensen, K. D., Jayaratne, T. E., Roberts, J. S., Kardia, S. L. R., & Petty, E. M. (2010). Understandings of basic genetics in the United States: results from a national survey of black and white men and women. Public health genomics, 13(7-8), 467-476.‏
[11]	Lea, D. H., Kaphingst, K. A., Bowen, D., Lipkus, I., & Hadley, D. W. (2010). Communicating genetic and genomic information: health literacy and numeracy considerations. Public health genomics, 14(4-5), 279-289.‏
[12]	Bowling, B.V., Acra, E.E., Wang, L., Myers, M.F., Dean, G.E., Markle, G.C., Huether, C.A., (2008a). Development and evaluation of a genetics literacy assessment instrument for undergraduates. Genetics, 178:15-22.
[13]	Bowling, B.V., Huether, C.A., Wang, L., Myers, M.F., Markle, G.C., Dean, G,E & Jacob, G.A. (2008b). Genetic literacy of undergraduate non-science majors and the impact of introductory biology and genetics courses. BioScience, 58: 654-660.
[14]	Fagen, A. P. (2003). Assessing and enhancing the introductory science course in physics and biology: Peer instruction, classroom demonstrations, and genetics vocabulary (Doctoral dissertation, Harvard University, Massachusetts.).
[15]	Marbach-Ad, G., &Stavy, R. (2000). Students' cellular and molecular explanations of genetic phenomena. Journal of Biological Education, 34(4), 200-205.‏
[16]	Smith, M. K., Wood, W. B., & Knight, J. K. (2008). The genetics concept assessment: a new concept inventory for gauging student understanding of genetics. CBE-Life Sciences Education, 7(4), 422-43.
[17]	Falcone, D. C., Wood, E. M., Xie, S. X., Siderowf, A., & Van Deerlin, V. M. (2011). Genetic testing and Parkinson disease: assessment of patient knowledge, attitudes, and interest. Journal of genetic counseling, 20(4), 384-395.‏
[18]	Klitzman, R.L., (2010). Misunderstandings Concerning Genetics Among Patients Confronting Genetic Disease. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 19: 430-446.
[19]	Michie, S., Lester, K., Pinto, J., &Marteau, T. M. (2005). Communicating risk information in genetic counseling: an observational study. Health education and behavior, 32(5), 589-598.‏
[20]	McBride C.M., Koehly L.M., Sanderson S.C., Kaphingst K.A. (2010) The behavioral response to personalized genetic information: will genetic risk profiles motivate individuals and families to choose more healthful behaviors? Annual Review of Public Health. 31:89-103.
[21]	Catz D.S., Green N.S., Tobin J.N., Lloyd- Puryear M.A., Kyler P., Umemoto A., …Wolman F. (2005). Attitudes about genetics in underserved, culturally diverse populations. Community Genetics 2005; 8:161-172.
[22]	Pivetti, M., &Melotti, G. (2013). Prenatal genetic testing: An investigation of determining factors affecting the decision-making process. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 22(1), 76-89.‏
[23]	Aqueel, A.I. (2007). Islamic ethical framework for research into and prevention of genetic diseases. Nature Genetics, 39: 1293-1298.
[24]	Shaw, A. & Hurst, J.A. (2008). “What is this Genetics, Anyway?” Understandings of genetics, illness causality and inheritance among British Pakistani users of genetic services. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 17:373-383.
[25]	Long, K. A., Thomas, S. B., Grubs, R. E., Gettig, E. A., &Krishnamurti, L. (2011). Attitudes and beliefs of African-Americans toward genetics, genetic testing, and sickle cell disease education and awareness. Journal of genetic counseling, 20(6), 572-592.‏
[26]	Central Bureau of Statistics [CBS], Israel. Available athttp://www.cbs , and accessed in 3/11/2013.
[27]	East, K. M., Hott, A. M., Callanan, N. P., & Lamb, N. E. (2012). Biotech 101: an educational outreach program in genetics and biotechnology. Journal of genetic counseling, 21(5), 704-712.‏
[28]	Morren, M., Rijken, M., Baanders, A. N., &Bensing, J. (2007). Perceived genetic knowledge, attitudes towards genetic testing, and the relationship between these among patients with a chronic disease. Patient Education and Counseling, 65(2), 197-204.‏
[29]	Wert, G. D., Meulen, R. T., Mordacci, R., &Tallacchini, M. (2003).Ethics and Genetics: A workbook for Practitioners and Students, Berghahn Books, New York.
[30]	Dawson, V., Carson, K., &Venville, G. (2009). Genetics education in the 21st century, a guide for Australian high school teachers.
[31]	Glynn, S. M., Taasoobshirazi, G., & Brickman, P. (2009). Science motivation questionnaire: Construct validation with nonscience majors. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 46(2), 127-146.‏
[32]	Peterson, R. A., & Kim, Y. (2013). On the relationship between coefficient alpha and composite reliability. Journal of Applied Psychology, 98(1), 194-198.‏
[33]	Singer, E., Antonucci, T., & Van Hoewyk, J. (2004). Racial and ethnic variations in knowledge and attitudes about genetic testing. Genetic Testing, 8(1), 31-43.‏
[34]	Bauer, M. W., Allum, N., & Miller, S. (2007). What can we learn from 25-years of PUS research? Liberating and expanding the agenda. Public Understanding of Science, 16(1), 79-95.
[35]	Wiggins, S., Whyte, P., Huggins, M., Adam, S., Theilmann, J., Bloch, M., & Hayden, M. R. (1992). The psychological consequences of predictive testing for Huntingtons disease. New England Journal of Medicine, 327(20), 1401-1405.‏
[36]	Wit, A., Tibben, A., Duivenvoorden, H. J., Niermeijer, M. F., &Passchier, J. (1998). Predicting adaptation to presymptomatic DNA testing for late onset disorders: Who will experience distress? Journal of medical genetics, 35(9), 745-754.‏
[37]	Frumkin, A., Raz, A.E., Plesser-Duvdevani, M. & Lieberman, S. (2011). "The Most Important Test You’ll Ever Take"? Attitudes toward confidential carrier matching and open individual testing among modern-religious Jews in Israel. Social Science & Medicine, 73: 1741-1747.
[38]	Remennick, L. (2006). The quest for the perfect baby: why do Israeli women seek prenatal genetic testing? Sociology of Health and Illness, 28(1), 21-53.‏
[39]	National Council for Excellence in Critical Thinking [NCECT]: Available at http://www.criticalthinking.org/ and accessed in 20/11/2014.
[40]	Solli, A., Bach, F., &Åkerman, B. (2014). Learning to argue as a biotechnologist: disprivileging opposition to genetically modified food. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 9(1), 1-23.‏
[41]	Ruderman, D. B. (2001). Jewish thought and scientific discovery in early modern Europe. Wayne State University Press, MI.‏
[42]	Soloveitchick, J. (1944) Ish ha-Halakhah, trans L. Kaplan, Halakhic Man. Jewish Publications Society, Philadelphia, PA.
[43]	Doolin, B., & Motion, J. (2010). Christian lay understandings of preimplantation genetic diagnosis. Public Understanding of Science, 19(6), 669-685.
[44]	Inglehart, R. F. & Norris, P. (2003). Rising tide: Gender equality and cultural change around the world. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
[45]	Fodor, É.,&Balogh, A. (2010). Back to the kitchen? Gender role attitudes in 13 East European countries. ZeitschriftfürFamilienforschung-Journal of Family Research, 22(3) 289-307.