Skip Navigation Links.
Collapse <span class="m110 colortj mt20 fontw700">Volume 12 (2024)</span>Volume 12 (2024)
Collapse <span class="m110 colortj mt20 fontw700">Volume 11 (2023)</span>Volume 11 (2023)
Collapse <span class="m110 colortj mt20 fontw700">Volume 10 (2022)</span>Volume 10 (2022)
Collapse <span class="m110 colortj mt20 fontw700">Volume 9 (2021)</span>Volume 9 (2021)
Collapse <span class="m110 colortj mt20 fontw700">Volume 8 (2020)</span>Volume 8 (2020)
Collapse <span class="m110 colortj mt20 fontw700">Volume 7 (2019)</span>Volume 7 (2019)
Collapse <span class="m110 colortj mt20 fontw700">Volume 6 (2018)</span>Volume 6 (2018)
Collapse <span class="m110 colortj mt20 fontw700">Volume 5 (2017)</span>Volume 5 (2017)
Collapse <span class="m110 colortj mt20 fontw700">Volume 4 (2016)</span>Volume 4 (2016)
Collapse <span class="m110 colortj mt20 fontw700">Volume 3 (2015)</span>Volume 3 (2015)
Collapse <span class="m110 colortj mt20 fontw700">Volume 2 (2014)</span>Volume 2 (2014)
Collapse <span class="m110 colortj mt20 fontw700">Volume 1 (2013)</span>Volume 1 (2013)
American Journal of Public Health Research. 2020, 8(1), 7-13
DOI: 10.12691/AJPHR-8-1-2
Original Research

The Physical Activity Level is Low in Young Adults: A Pilot Study from Turkey

Nilüfer Acar Tek1, , Hande Mortaş1, Sabriye Arslan1, Tuğba Tatar1 and Süleyman Köse1

1Gazi University, Faculty of Health Sciences, Department of Nutrition and Dietetics, Ankara, Turkey

Pub. Date: January 14, 2020

Cite this paper

Nilüfer Acar Tek, Hande Mortaş, Sabriye Arslan, Tuğba Tatar and Süleyman Köse. The Physical Activity Level is Low in Young Adults: A Pilot Study from Turkey. American Journal of Public Health Research. 2020; 8(1):7-13. doi: 10.12691/AJPHR-8-1-2

Abstract

Objectives: To determine the physical activity levels of young adults using the pedometer (pedometer step count-PSC), International Physical Activity-Short Form (IPAQ-SF), and physical activity diary (PAD) methods, and to compare these methods with one another. Methods: This study was conducted in 551 individuals aged between 18 and 30 years. A questionnaire that includes socio-demographic characteristics, physical activity habits, and anthropometric measurements of the individuals was administrated. Three instruments were used: PSC, PAD, and IPAQ-SF. Results: The three different physical activity evaluation instruments were shown positive correlation (p < 0.01). According to BMI, 13.2% of individuals were underweight; 12.9% were overweight; and 73.9% had healthy weight. There was no significant difference in physical activity level between BMI groups (underweight, normal weight and overweight) according to all evaluation methods. The majority of the individuals were active according to PSC (50.1%) and IPAQ-SF (59.7%). However, 61.2% of the individuals were sedentary according to the PAD. In addition, 48.5% of the individuals met the target of 10000 steps/d and 38.9% of them met the target of being active (PAL ≥1.7) while 13.4% of them met the target of 30 min/d moderate-to vigorous-intensity physical activity. Conclusions: The percentage of individuals met daily physical activity goal is low in young adults according to the different evaluation methods. Therefore, it is necessary to determine whether any of the changes brought about by the transition to university life are also physical inactivity.

Keywords

physical activity, step count, pedometer, young adults, health

Copyright

Creative CommonsThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

References

[1]  Sigmundova D, Sigmund E, Hamrik Z, Kalman M, Pavelka J, Frömel K. Sedentary behaviour and physical activity of randomised sample of czech adults aged 20-64 years: IPAQ and GPAQ studies between 2002 and 2011. Cent Eur J Public Health 2015; 23: 91-96.
 
[2]  World Health Organization. Physical Inactivity: A Global Public Health Problem. WHO; 2016.
 
[3]  Ministry of Health of Turkey. Turkey Burden of Disease Study (In Turkish); 2006.
 
[4]  Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare of Japan. Exercise and Physical Activity Guide for Health Promotion; 2007.
 
[5]  Australian Government Department of Health. Australia’s Physical Activity & Sedentary Behaviour Guidelines for Adult; 2014.
 
[6]  President's Council on Fitness. Sports & Nutrition Presidential Active Lifestyle Award: Activity + Nutrition (PALA+); 2016.
 
[7]  Report of a Joint FAO/WHO/UNU Expert Consultation. Human energy requirements; 2001.
 
[8]  Ministry of Health of Turkey. Turkey Physical Activity Guideline; 2014. (In Turkish); 2004.
 
[9]  Ministry of Health of Turkey. Healthy Weight Control Pedometer (pedometer) Usage Rules (In Turkish); 2016.
 
[10]  Goje M, Salmiah S, Ahmad Azuhairi A, Jusoff K. Physical Inactivity and Its Associated Factors among University Students. Journal of Dental and Medical Sciences 2014; 13 (10): 119-130.
 
[11]  Hazizi AS, Mohd HB, Leong YM, Izumi T. Assessment of Physical Activity among Undergraduate Students in a Local University using a Pedometer. Health and the Environment Journal 2012; 3 (1): 54-66.
 
[12]  Sinclair KM, Hamlin MJ, Steel Gd. Physical activity levels of first-year New Zealand university students: a pilot study. Youth Stud Aust 2005; 24 (1): 38.
 
[13]  Hwang J, Kim YH. Physical Activity and its Related Motivational Attributes in Adolescents with Different BMI. Int J Behav Med 2013; 20: 106-113.
 
[14]  De Cocker K, Cardon G, De Bourdeaudhuij I. Pedometer-determined physical activity and its comparison with the International Physical Activity Questionnaire in a sample of Belgian adults. Res Q Exerc Sport 2007; 78: 429-437.
 
[15]  Tudor-Locke C, Ainsworth BE, Whitt MC, Thompson RW, Addy CL, Jones DA. The relationship between pedometer-determined ambulatory activity and body composition variables. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord 2001; 25: 1571-1578.
 
[16]  Saglam M, Arıkan H, Savcı S, Inal-Ince D, Bosnak-Guclu M, Karabulut E, Tokgozoglu L. Internatıonal physical activity questionnaire: reliability and validity of the Turkish version. Percept Mot Skills 2010; 111: 278-284.
 
[17]  IPAQ Research Committee. Guidelines for Data Processing and Analysis of the International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ)–Short and Long Forms; 2005.
 
[18]  LaPorte RE, Montoye HJ, Caspersen CJ. Assessment of physical activity in epidemiologic research: problems and prospects. Public Health Rep 1985; 100: 131-146.
 
[19]  Manley AF. Physical activity and health: a report of the Surgeon General. Atlanta: Diane Publishing; 1996.
 
[20]  American Collage of Sports Medicine. Guideline for exercise testing and prescription. 6th ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2000.
 
[21]  Le Masurier GC, Sidman CL, Corbin CB. Accumulating 10,000 steps: does this meet current physical activity guidelines? Res Q Exerc Sport 2003; 74: 389-94.
 
[22]  Wahlberg D. Pedometers help walkers stay on track. The Atlanta Journal-Constitution. 2003:13.
 
[23]  Wilde BE, Sidman CL, Corbin CB. A 10000-step count as a physical activity target for sedentary women. Res Q Exerc Sport 2001; 72: 411-414.
 
[24]  Minister of Health of Turkey. Turkey Nutrition and Health Research (In Turkish); 2014.
 
[25]  Ölçücü B, Vatansever Ş, Özcan G, Çelik A, Paktaş Y. The relationship between physical activity level and depression and anxiety in university students (In Turkish). International Online Journal of Educational Sciences 2015; 4: 58-67.
 
[26]  Savcı S, Öztürk M, Arıkan H, İnal-İnce D, Tokgözoğlu L. Physical activity level of university students (In Turkish). Turk Kardiyol Dern Ars 2006; 34: 166-172.
 
[27]  Fagaras SP, Radu LE, Vanvu G. The Level of Physical Activity of University Students. Procedia Soc Behav Sci 2015; 197: 1454-1457.
 
[28]  Welk GJ, Differding JA, Thompson RW, Blair SN, Dziura J, Hart P. The utility of the Digi-Walker step counter to assess physical activity patterns. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2000; 32: 481-488.
 
[29]  Bassett DR, Schneider PL, Huntington GE. Physical activity in an old order Amish community. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2004; 36: 79-85.
 
[30]  Tudor-Locke C, Williams JE, Reis JR, Pluto D. Utility of pedometers for assessing physical activity: convergent validity. Sports Med 2002; 32: 795-808.
 
[31]  De Cocker KA, De Bourdeaudhuij IM, Cardon GM. What do pedometer counts represent? A comparison between pedometer data and data from four different questionnaires. Public Health Nutr 2008; 12: 74-81.
 
[32]  Colpani V, Spritzer PM, Lodi AP, Dorigo GG, Severo de Miranda IA, Hahn LB, Palludo LP, Pietroski RL, Oppermann K. Physical activity in climacteric women: comparison between self-reporting and pedometer. Revista De Saude Publica 2014; 48: 258-265.
 
[33]  Ramírez-Marrero FA, Rivera-Brown AM, Nazario CM, Rodríguez-Orengo JF, Smit E, Smith BA. Self-reported physical activity in Hispanic adults living with HIV: comparison with accelerometer and pedometer. J Assoc Nurses AIDS Care 2008; 19: 283-294.
 
[34]  Sigmundová D, ChmelÍk F, Sigmund E, Feltlová D, Frömel K. Physical activity in the lifestyle of Czech university students: Meeting health recommendations. Eur J Sport Sci 2013; 13: 744-750.
 
[35]  Villanueva K, Giles-Corti B, McCormack G. Achieving 10,000 steps: A comparison of public transport users and drivers in a university setting. Prev Med 2008; 47: 338-341.
 
[36]  Miller R, Brown W, Tudor-Locke C. But what about swimming and cycling? How to ‘count’ non-ambulatory activity when using pedometers to assess physical activity? J Phys Act Health 2006; 3: 257-266.
 
[37]  Van Poppel MN, Chinapaw MJ, Mokkink LB, Van Mechelen W, Terwee CB. Physical activity questionnaires for adults. Sports Med 2010; 40: 565-600.